Miguel Damas vs Matteo Fondriest Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Jun at 09:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Damas vs M. Fondriest

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Damas 1 - 0 Fondriest
They have played 2 sets in total, with Miguel Damas winning 2 and Matteo Fondriest winning 0. The last match between Miguel Damas and Matteo Fondriest was at the M25 Montauban, 24-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Miguel Damas getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Damas | 1 |
| Fondriest | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Montauban(06-24-25)
M. Damas vs M. Fondriest H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.32% (261-179) | Career Total W/L | 53.19% (100-88) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Damas vs M. Fondriest Match Preview:
- Damas holds a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 40.68% of points compared to Fondriest's 39.81%. Could this marginal lead influence the match outcome? It's possible.
- When it comes to return games, Damas also commands a minor advantage, having won 47.52% of their opponent's second serves against Fondriest's 46.9%. In terms of first serve returns, Damas secures 33.39%, outperforming Fondriest's 30.75%.
- Damas displays stronger resilience under pressure, saving 53.15% of breakpoints versus Fondriest's 41.54%.
- Both players have similar yearly win rates, with Damas slightly ahead at 61.9% compared to Fondriest's 61.43%.
- Damas excels on clay surfaces with 60% win rate, while Fondriest prefers hard courts with a 58% win rate, potentially impacting performance based on the event's surface.
- In lower-tier tournaments, Damas boasts a higher win percentage, 71.43% against Fondriest's 62.32% in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events. What could this signify for the upcoming match? Experience at this level might serve Damas well.
- Fondriest consistently faces tougher opponents, with an average rank of 170.54, whereas Damas challenges players averaging a 396.39 ranking.
- When matches reach a deciding set, Damas has a 56% success rate, slightly above Fondriest's 53%.
- Damas leads in converting break points with a 39.36% conversion rate, marginally ahead of Fondriest's 38.24%.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
Overall, performance metrics indicate that Damas has a minor but consistent advantage in critical aspects of the game, including second serve efficacy, return game proficiency, and under-pressure resilience.
With slightly better statistics in break point conversions and ability to adapt on various surfaces, especially with a strong showing on clay, Damas might possess the nuanced edge needed in closely contested scenarios.
Fondriest also demonstrates competence, particularly on hard courts, and faces more formidable opponents regularly, which might provide valuable experience in high-stakes situations.
Considering the statistical insights and trends, Damas appears the more likely victor in this upcoming matchup, poised with subtle advantages that could tip the scale in their favor.
Miguel Damas vs Matteo Fondriest Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Damas vs M. Fondriest H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:57:7 | Average Match Time | 1:57:7 |
| 56% (36/64) | 1st Serve % | 57% (40/70) |
| 64% (23/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (22/40) |
| 54% (15/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 49% (34/70) | Return Points Win % | 41% (26/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Damas Recent Matches Played
M. Fondriest Recent Matches Played

M. Damas vs M. Fondriest Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.32% (261/179) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.19% (100/88) |
| 56.78% (582/443) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.76% (229/197) |
| 52.45% (5130/4650) | Games Win/Loss | 52.18% (2169/1988) |
| 53.66% (66/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.84% (43/34) |
| 62.30% (195/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.58% (49/46) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 386 | Aces Total | 233 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 934 | Total Double Faults | 153 |
| 1:32:36 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 430.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 163.87 |
| 66% (16456/24981) | 1st Serve % | 57% (3171/5609) |
| 63% (10313/16456) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2049/3171) |
| 49% (4191/8524) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1170/2438) |
| 46% (1246/2730) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (227/521) |
| 43% (10367/24196) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2199/5493) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.56% (44/57) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 64.20% (217/121) | Futures W/L | 54.05% (100/85) |
| 59% (258/436) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (99/186) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (69/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (19/39) |
| 58% (86/149) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (21/50) |
| 86% (256/221) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (103/85) |
| 14% (256/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (103/18) |
| 22% (184/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (85/15) |